LDV Groove Capital — Governance
We believe long-term value is built through clear decision rights, disciplined oversight, transparent records and conduct that remains responsible even when no one is watching.
Direction & accountability
Clear decision rights
Controls & escalation
Integrity in action
Reliable records & review
LDV Groove Capital operates as the India holding company and group headquarters. Its governance role is to guide the group, protect enterprise value, allocate capital responsibly and maintain a consolidated view across operating companies.
The framework is designed to separate ownership, oversight and operating execution while keeping decisions connected through clear authority, documented approvals and timely reporting.
Every material decision should have an identifiable owner, approver and record.
Commercial ambition never overrides law, fairness or responsible conduct.
Information should be accurate, timely, accessible and appropriately challenged.
Capital, brands, data, relationships and reputation are managed for long-term value.
The governance model separates strategic control from operational execution. Each layer has defined responsibilities, escalation paths and reporting expectations.
Sets strategic direction, protects shareholder interests and retains authority over decisions that can materially affect the group.
Translates group direction into operating plans, budgets, priorities and measurable responsibilities.
Manage day-to-day business within approved mandates, applicable law and group standards.
Finance, legal, compliance, technology and assurance functions provide independent checks and consolidated intelligence.
Governance is not a single document. It is a set of related practices covering authority, conduct, risk, compliance, information and accountability.
Board oversight, reserved matters, delegated authority, reporting and accountability across group entities.
Expected standards of conduct, honesty, fairness, respect, responsible competition and protection of the group’s reputation.
A structured process for identifying, assessing, controlling, monitoring and escalating material risks.
Company law, tax, labour, product, consumer, trade, data and sector-specific obligations managed by the responsible entity.
Zero tolerance for improper payments, kickbacks, facilitation payments or hidden benefits intended to influence decisions.
Prompt disclosure and fair management of personal, financial or relationship interests that could affect judgement.
Confidential channels for raising concerns, with fair review, non-retaliation and appropriate escalation.
Purpose-limited collection, access control, secure processing, retention discipline and responsible use of information.
A controlled library of approved policies, procedures, delegated authorities, registers and review schedules.
Strategy, ownership, capital, major financing, acquisitions, guarantees, material disputes and structural decisions retained by the board or shareholders.
Budgets, senior appointments, major contracts, pricing exceptions, material suppliers, market entry and significant technology commitments.
Routine commercial and operational decisions within approved budgets, policies, contracts and risk limits.
Finance, legal, compliance, technology and specialist review where a decision creates regulatory, financial, data or reputational exposure.
Delegation should make the organisation faster, not less accountable. Authority is therefore linked to role, value, risk, geography and the nature of the commitment.
Clarify what can be approved, by whom, within which limits and under what conditions.
Material payments, contracts and changes should not be initiated and finally approved by the same person.
Maintain the commercial rationale, supporting evidence, approvals, conditions and follow-up actions.
Urgent or unusual decisions must be elevated when they exceed authority, policy or acceptable risk.
Risk ownership remains with the business. The governance function provides a common method, reporting discipline and escalation framework so material exposures are visible across the group.
Capture strategic, financial, operational, legal, product, technology, people and reputational risks.
Evaluate likelihood, impact, velocity, control strength and interdependence with other risks.
Assign owners, preventive controls, detective controls, contingency plans and target dates.
Track indicators, control failures, overdue actions, incidents, complaints and external changes.
Escalate material issues through timely dashboards, exception reports and decision papers.
Use incidents, reviews and audit findings to strengthen processes, training and accountability.
People acting for the group are expected to use sound judgement, follow the law, treat others fairly and protect confidential information, company assets and the group’s reputation.
Do not offer, promise, request or accept anything intended to improperly influence a commercial or official decision.
Personal interests, family relationships, outside work, ownership or gifts that could affect judgement should be disclosed before a decision is made.
Use accurate information, respect intellectual property and avoid misleading claims, hidden commitments or unfair treatment.
Respect dignity, privacy, safety, confidential records and legitimate access restrictions.
A credible speak-up mechanism gives employees and partners a safe route to report suspected misconduct, control failures or legal concerns. Reports should be handled discreetly, fairly and by people without a conflict.
Examples include suspected fraud, bribery, harassment, falsified records, conflicts, unsafe practices, data misuse, retaliation or deliberate non-compliance.
Financial misconduct or misuse of assets
Bribery, kickbacks or improper influence
Harassment, discrimination or retaliation
Product, safety, legal or data concerns
A report should be made honestly and with available facts. It does not need to prove wrongdoing before review begins.
The final mechanism should identify authorised reporting channels, intake responsibilities, conflict checks, evidence preservation, investigation standards and escalation routes.
Receive and acknowledge the concern
Protect confidentiality and prevent retaliation
Assess independence, urgency and scope
Investigate, decide and document corrective action
Public contact details should only be published after the designated reporting channels and case-management ownership are formally approved.
The policy library should be controlled, versioned and periodically reviewed. The following areas form the recommended public-facing governance map.
Reserved matters, approval thresholds, meeting records, authority levels and decision documentation.
Integrity, respectful conduct, fair dealing, confidentiality, assets, records and responsible communication.
Improper payments, gifts, hospitality, facilitation payments, third-party risk and political or charitable contributions.
Identification, declaration, recusal, approval, registers and ongoing review of personal interests.
Risk taxonomy, appetite, ownership, registers, indicators, escalation and corrective-action monitoring.
Lawful use, access, retention, incident response, vendor controls, cyber hygiene and responsible AI.
Confidential reporting, triage, investigation, protection, case records and board-level escalation.
Statutory calendars, licenses, contracts, tax records, product documentation, approvals and retention schedules.
Digital systems can improve visibility, consistency and speed, but they do not replace responsible judgement. Material actions should remain subject to defined human review and approval.
Maintain authoritative master data for entities, suppliers, products, inventory, finance and approvals.
Payments, pricing changes, material contracts, customer communications and sensitive actions require authorised sign-off.
System access should follow job responsibilities, least privilege, periodic review and prompt removal when roles change.
Automated workflows should create logs, alerts and exceptions that can be reviewed and challenged.
Governance reporting should provide a consolidated view without weakening local accountability. The level and frequency of review should reflect materiality and risk.
Strategy, capital, performance, material risks, legal matters and decisions requiring reserved authority.
Budgets, cash flow, profitability, inventory, receivables, exceptions, forecasts and corrective actions.
Priority risks, incidents, overdue controls, statutory status, complaints and emerging regulatory issues.
Statutory audit, specialist review, legal advice, testing or investigation where required by law or risk.
Strong governance protects people, capital, brands, relationships and reputation—creating the confidence required for sustainable long-term growth.
© 2026 LDV Groove Capital Private Limited. All Rights Reserved. · Capital · Strategy · Growth