Home › Governance › Conflict of Interest
LDV Groove’s intended conflict-of-interest framework is designed to identify personal, financial and relational interests before they influence—or appear to influence—business judgement, procurement, hiring, investment, partnerships or the use of confidential information.
Before decisions are made
Step away when independence is affected
Approval outside the conflicted chain
Reason, mitigation and outcome recorded
Interests updated as circumstances evolve
Directors, employees, agents and other representatives should act in the legitimate interests of the Group and disclose circumstances that could affect, or reasonably appear to affect, their objectivity.
A personal interest directly competes with a duty to LDV Groove or affects a current decision.
A situation may develop into a conflict as responsibilities, ownership, relationships or transactions change.
Even where judgement remains impartial, a reasonable observer may question whether the decision was independent.
Disclosure is continuing. Material changes should be reported promptly rather than waiting for an annual declaration.
Core rule: When personal benefit, loyalty or relationship intersects with a business decision, disclose first and allow an independent person to determine the appropriate safeguards.
The intended governance model separates disclosure from approval and gives greater scrutiny to board matters, procurement, hiring, investment, related-party transactions and access to confidential information.
Declare relevant interests, avoid participation in conflicted matters and ensure related-party decisions receive independent oversight.
Assess disclosures, design mitigation, protect confidentiality and escalate material or unresolved conflicts.
Identify local risks, avoid self-approval and ensure conflicted people do not influence supplier, customer or people decisions.
Make complete, timely disclosures and comply with recusal, reassignment, restriction or divestment requirements.
Controls should begin when the interest first arises and continue until the transaction, relationship or role has ended and the mitigation is no longer needed.
Recognise personal, financial, relational or outside interests connected to a business responsibility.
Provide the relevant facts, people, entities, value, timing and decision context through an authorised route.
Determine whether the conflict is actual, potential or perceived and evaluate its materiality.
Use recusal, independent approval, reassignment, information barriers, conditions or divestment where appropriate.
Document the disclosure, assessment, decision, participants, restrictions and review date.
Reassess when roles, ownership, relationships, contracts or the decision environment change.
The categories below help teams recognise situations requiring disclosure, recusal, independent approval or prohibition.
Relatives, household members, close friends or personal partners connected to buyers, suppliers, candidates, customers or regulators.
Ownership, investments, loans, commissions, debt, profit-sharing or other economic interests in a counterparty or competitor.
Second jobs, consulting, directorships, advisory work, partnerships or side businesses that compete, consume time or create divided loyalty.
Deals involving directors, employees, significant owners, their relatives or entities they control or influence.
Supplier selection, pricing, contract renewal or tender activity involving prior employment, personal relationships or hidden benefits.
Recruitment, promotion, pay, performance, disciplinary action or reporting lines involving relatives or close associates.
Courtesies, travel, discounts, favours or personal benefits that could create obligation or affect impartial judgement.
Using confidential data, business opportunities, supplier access or Group assets for personal advantage or an outside interest.
Not every disclosed interest requires prohibition. The assessment should consider decision authority, materiality, access to information, personal benefit, public perception and whether reliable safeguards can remove the influence.
The interest is remote or irrelevant to the decision. Record the assessment when appropriate and proceed normally.
Use recusal, alternative approvers, information restrictions, reassignment, competitive process or ongoing monitoring.
Do not proceed unless the interest, role or transaction is removed, restructured or independently approved under applicable law and policy.
Recusal should be meaningful, not symbolic. The person should step away from recommendation, negotiation, approval, voting, access to restricted information and informal influence.
Identify the matter, relationship, financial interest and the individual’s decision-making role.
Remove the conflicted person from evaluation, negotiation, approval and confidential deliberation.
Use decision-makers without the same interest and with sufficient authority and information.
Use competitive quotations, valuation, performance criteria, market comparisons and written rationale.
Document the recusal, attendees, evidence, approval and any continuing restrictions.
Recusal must be complete: A person should not privately lobby colleagues, select the alternative approver, influence scoring or receive restricted information after stepping away.
Relationships do not automatically disqualify a supplier, candidate or partner, but they should never receive hidden preference or bypass ordinary controls.
A connected party may be considered where the relationship is disclosed and the selection remains demonstrably fair and commercially justified.
Material transactions, senior appointments, sole-source awards, unusual pricing or decisions involving directors and significant owners.
Hidden ownership, fabricated competition, undisclosed influence, preferential terms without rationale or retaliation against those raising concerns.
People with access to strategy, pricing, designs, supplier terms, investment plans, customer data or potential transactions should use that access only for authorised company purposes.
Do not share non-public information with an outside business, relative, investor or prospective employer without authority.
Do not divert an opportunity identified through company role, assets, relationships or information for personal benefit.
Use systems, funds, inventory, personnel, intellectual property and facilities only for approved purposes.
Where a manageable conflict exists, restrict access and decision rights to what is necessary.
A well-managed disclosure process should protect legitimate personal information, limit access to those who need it and distinguish good-faith transparency from misconduct.
Seek guidance when unsure whether a relationship, investment, gift, outside role or opportunity creates a conflict.
Provide complete information promptly; a disclosed conflict can often be managed responsibly.
Handle personal and commercial information carefully and share it only for assessment and control.
Do not disadvantage anyone for making a good-faith disclosure, declining a conflicted instruction or raising a concern.
Reporting should protect privacy while giving authorised leaders enough information to understand exposure, confirm mitigation and identify patterns in procurement, hiring, related-party transactions and outside activities.
Track current declarations, review dates, affected decisions and unresolved information requests.
Confirm recusal, reassignment, restrictions, independent approval and continuing conditions are operating.
Escalate significant transactions and board-level interests through the appropriate governance route.
Review late disclosures, repeated conflicts, control bypasses, retaliation and overdue corrective actions.
The related pages explain the wider governance architecture supporting impartial decisions and transparent accountability.
Board responsibilities, delegated authority and subsidiary accountability.
Controls for gifts, intermediaries, payments and improper influence.
Publication note: This page describes an intended conflict-of-interest framework for LDV Groove Capital and its group companies. It does not confirm that a board-approved policy, conflict register, annual declaration process, quantified materiality thresholds, related-party committee, reporting channel, investigation protocol or independent assurance plan is already adopted or operational. Final public content should be verified against current board approvals, constitutional documents, employment terms, contracts, local law, privacy requirements and actual reporting arrangements.
Long-term value is protected when personal relationships and financial interests are disclosed, assessed independently and managed transparently.
© 2026 LDV Groove Capital Private Limited. All Rights Reserved. · Capital · Strategy · Growth